Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:17

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
What is the worst emotional pain you ever felt as an adult?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Apple Is About to Upgrade Your Current AirPods with Some Neat New Abilities - Gear Patrol
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Poor appetite? What that can mean and how to get hungry again - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
There’s a simple solution to the Shemar Stewart impasse with the Bengals - NBC Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Belmont Stakes 2025: Win, place, show, exacta, trifecta and superfecta picks - SportsLine
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
If you got to make your own K-pop year-end awards show for 2024, who would win?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What's the most impressive feature of Claude AI according to its users?